Arahan Mitigasi Bencana Banjir Di Perumnas Antang Dengan Konsep Ekodrainase (Sumur Resapan)

Penulis

  • Elisabet Febriani Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Bosowa
  • Rahmawati Rahman Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Bosowa
  • Emil Salim Rasyidi Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Bosowa
  • Tri Budiharto Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Bosowa
  • Rimba Arief Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Bosowa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35965/jups.v6i1.716

Kata Kunci:

Mitigasi, Bencana Banjir, Ekodrainase

Abstrak

Abstract. Ecodrainage is a process of managing rainwater and its runoff in an integrated and environmentally sound manner. Perumnas Antang is one of the areas that is densely populated with buildings and residents in Manggala District, Makassar City. Knowing the existing drainage conditions are not in accordance with the capacity needed in Perumnas Antang.The application of infiltration wells in the existing area is adjusted to the problems that occur in Perumnas Antang, namely the high intensity of rainfall which results in inundation on the surface and cannot penetrate properly into the soil. By knowing the function of the infiltration well itself, which is to collect rainwater and absorb it from soil problems before being flowed into rivers or the sea. To analyze it, a superimpose or overlay analysis is used to determine the level of flood vulnerability in Perumnas Antang. The overlay process is carried out by combining several base maps that have their own dignity. After knowing the level of flood vulnerability in Perumnas Antang, an analysis of infiltration wells was carried out using the formula for calculating the Volume of Wells and the Number of Infiltration Wells needed at the research location by looking at the standard capacity capacity. The flood vulnerability level at the research site has three classifications, namely a high vulnerability level of 228.77 Ha, a medium vulnerability level of 63.56, and a low vulnerability level of 11.94. From the results of the analysis of the flood vulnerability level, an analysis of infiltration wells was carried out to determine the number of wells needed. From the results of the analysis of infiltration wells that have been calculated based on the volume and flow rate that has been inflowed, the number of infiltration wells needed is 23 units..

 

Abstrak. Ekodrainase merupakan suatu proses pengelolaan air hujan dan limpasannya secara terpadu damn berwawasan lingkungan. Perumnas Antang merupakan salah satu Kawasan yang padat bangunan dan penduduk di Kecamatan Manggala Kota Makassar. Mengetahui kondisi drainase eksisting tidak sesuai dengan kapasitas daya tampung yang di butuhkan di Perumnas Antang.Penerapan Sumur Resapan di kawasan eksisting di sesuaikan dengan pemasalahan yang terjadi di perumnas antang yaitu tingginya intensitas curah hujan yang mengakibatkan genangan di atas permukaan dan tidak dapat meresap dengan baik kedalam tanah. Dengan mengetahu fungsi dari sumur resapan sendiri yaitu untuk mmanmpung air hujan dan meresapkannya kedala tanah sebelum di alirkan ke sungai atau laut. Untuk menganalisisnya, di gunakan analisis superimpose atau overlay untuk mengetahui tingkat kerawanan banjir yang ada di Perumnas Antang. Proses overlay dilakukan dengan cara menggabungkan beberapa peta dasar yang memiliki harkat masing-masing. Setelah mengetahui tingkat kerawanan banjir di Perumnas Antang, maka di lakukan analisis sumur resapan dengan menggunakan rumus perhitungan Volume Sumur dan Jumlah Sumur Resapan yang di butuhkan di lokasi penelitian dengan melihat standar kapasitas daya tampung. Tingkat kerawanan banjir di lokasi penelitian memiliki tiga klasifikasi yaitu tingkat kerawanan tinggi seluas 228,77 Ha, tingkat kerawanan sedang seluas 63,56, dan tingkat kerawanan rendah seluas 11,94. Dari hasil analisis tingkat kerawanan banjir maka di lakukan analisis sumur resapan untuk mengetahui jumlah sumur yang di butuhkan. Dari hasil analisis sumur resapan yang telah di hitung berdasarkan volume dan beit aliran yang masuk, maka di peroleh jumlah sumur resapan yang di butuhkan yaitu sebanyak 23 unit.

Referensi

Ahiablame, L. M., Engel, B. A., & Chaubey, I. (2019). Effectiveness of low impact development practices: Literature review and suggestions for future research. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(7), 4253–4273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2

Alves, A., Gersonius, B., Sanchez, A., Vojinovic, Z., & Kapelan, Z. (2020). Multi-functional flood risk management approaches in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102351

Angel, S., Blei, A. M., Parent, J., & Lamson-Hall, P. (2021). The spatial structure of American cities: The great majority of workplaces are no longer in CBDs. Cities, 111, 103070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103070

Bolstad, P. (2019). GIS fundamentals: A first text on geographic information systems (6th ed.). XanEdu.

Brown, R. R., Keath, N., & Wong, T. H. F. (2022). Urban water management in cities: Historical, current and future regimes. Water Science and Technology, 66(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.287

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. (2019). Urban–rural differences in disaster resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 104(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.756267

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (4th ed.). Routledge.

Du, S., van Rompaey, A., Shi, P., & Wang, J. (2020). A dual effect of urban expansion on flood risk in the Pearl River Delta. Natural Hazards, 101(2), 741–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03895-6

Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T., Nazmfar, H., & Rezaei Moghaddam, M. H. (2021). Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 12(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1862290

Fletcher, T. D., Andrieu, H., & Hamel, P. (2015). Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(12), 4765–4779. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4765-2013

Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., Barraud, S., Semadeni-Davies, A., Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L., & Uhl, M. (2021). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314

Gersonius, B., Vojinovic, Z., Dircke, P., & Ashley, R. (2018). Flood risk management under climate change: Resistance, resilience and adaptability. Proceedings of the ICE – Water Management, 165(11), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.12.00030

IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896

Johnston, M. P. (2017). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626.

Kumar, R. (2021). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kundzewicz, Z. W., Pińskwar, I., & Brakenridge, G. R. (2022). Large floods in Europe, 1985–2020. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 67(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2037990

Li, J., Xu, J., Zhang, C., & Li, H. (2022). Effectiveness of sponge city construction in urban flood mitigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 130331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130331

Liu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, L., & Chen, X. (2023). Impacts of urbanization on hydrological processes and flood risk. Science of the Total Environment, 858, 159879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159879

Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information science and systems (4th ed.). Wiley.

Malczewski, J. (2020). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. Springer.

Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. Springer.

Nguyen, K. V., James, H., & Walters, G. (2021). Household flood adaptation and resilience in urban areas. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 61, 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102327

Rahman, A., Dbais, J., & Imteaz, M. (2020). Sustainability of rainwater harvesting systems in urban water management. Water, 12(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020521

Rahmati, O., Falah, F., Dayal, K. S., Deo, R. C., Mohammadi, F., Biggs, T., & Moghaddam, D. D. (2020). Machine learning approaches for spatial modeling of flood susceptibility. Journal of Hydrology, 591, 125660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125660

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Seto, K. C., Golden, J. S., Alberti, M., & Turner, B. L. (2017). Sustainability in an urbanizing planet. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), 8935–8938. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606037114

Shuster, W. D., Bonta, J., Thurston, H., Warnemuende, E., & Smith, D. R. (2019). Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology. Urban Water Journal, 2(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620500386529

Wang, Y., Hong, H., Chen, W., Li, S., & Pamučar, D. (2022). Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS and multi-criteria decision-making methods. Natural Hazards, 112(2), 1257–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05100-5

Ward, P. J., Blauhut, V., Bloemendaal, N., Daniell, J. E., de Ruiter, M. C., Duncan, M. J., Emberson, R., Jenkins, S. F., Kirschbaum, D., & Kunz, M. (2020). Review article: Natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20(4), 1069–1096. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1069-2020

Ward, P. J., et al. (2020). Natural hazard risk assessments. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20, 1069–1096. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1069-2020

Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Liu, J., & Chen, Y. (2023). Performance of infiltration facilities in reducing urban runoff. Journal of Hydrology, 617, 128943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128943

Zhou, Q., Leng, G., & Su, J. (2021). Urban flood risk assessment. Journal of Hydrology, 603, 126970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126970

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2025-11-30

Cara Mengutip

Febriani, E., Rahman, R. ., Salim Rasyidi, E., Budiharto, T., & Arief, R. (2025). Arahan Mitigasi Bencana Banjir Di Perumnas Antang Dengan Konsep Ekodrainase (Sumur Resapan). Journal of Urban Planning Studies, 6(1), 038-049. https://doi.org/10.35965/jups.v6i1.716